Concerns about iPhone 17 durability are growing after a recent scratch test exposed several weaknesses. Apple introduced the iPhone 17 Pro as its most robust and sophisticated smartphone to date. Yet a durability test by YouTube’s JerryRigEverything reveals surprising shortcomings in how well the device holds up under regular use.
In the durability test, the phone’s screen began scratching at level six on the Mohs hardness scale. Deeper marks became visible at level seven. While this is consistent with many smartphones, Apple claimed the new Ceramic Shield glass offered superior protection. These test results challenge that claim, leaving users concerned.
Surprisingly, the titanium frame also failed to resist basic surface wear. Keys and coins caused visible scuffs during light contact. The damage appeared even without force, which surprised many who believed the titanium body would offer better scratch resistance. This has cast doubt on the effectiveness of Apple’s choice of materials.
On the brighter side, the phone successfully passed the bend test. It did not warp, snap, or bend under pressure. This confirms the iPhone 17 Pro is structurally sound. However, structural strength does not mean it resists daily cosmetic damage. Unfortunately, iPhone 17 durability issues seem to focus more on surface-level vulnerabilities.
Apple’s decision to switch from stainless steel to titanium helped reduce the weight significantly. Many users appreciate this change. However, it seems the titanium alloy is more susceptible to minor scratches. The matte texture also does little to hide marks, which become noticeable under direct lighting.
Many users carry phones alongside other everyday items in pockets and bags. Contact with coins, keys, or zippers is nearly unavoidable. That makes scratch resistance even more important. These tests demonstrate that the iPhone 17 Pro is not ideal in such common environments.
Therefore, early adopters and reviewers recommend using protective accessories. Screen protectors and durable cases can help avoid immediate wear and tear. These additions do protect the phone, but they also detract from its sleek design. Moreover, they add extra cost to an already expensive device.
Rear glass performance fared slightly better in the test. However, it still scratched under standard pressure. Even the camera bump, made from the same titanium material, showed minor flaws. It seems no part of the phone is truly resistant to external damage.
Apple has not released any official comment on the test outcomes. In previous years, Apple addressed such concerns only after widespread media attention. Some users hope software updates or revised hardware materials might address the issue, but no fixes have been confirmed yet.
Resale value also becomes a concern with visible wear. Cosmetic flaws significantly reduce the resale or trade-in value. Since many users rely on Apple’s upgrade program, maintaining phone condition is essential. The iPhone 17 durability concerns could directly affect financial value for many buyers.
On the performance front, the phone excels. The new A19 chip is fast, and the improved camera system delivers professional-level results. However, these technical achievements are somewhat overshadowed by the poor scratch performance. For many, both function and form matter equally in a premium smartphone.
Several Android competitors have focused heavily on durability in recent models. Phones using Gorilla Glass Victus 2 or hardened aluminum frames have outperformed the iPhone in similar tests. As a result, Apple may now face more pressure to prioritize scratch resistance.
In summary, the iPhone 17 Pro shows remarkable internal performance but disappointing surface durability. Apple’s choice of materials hasn’t delivered the protection users expected. While structure and function remain strong, iPhone 17 durability concerns could influence buying decisions. Until improvements arrive, users should consider protective options as essential.
